Soccer, The World Cup & ESPN

This is Part I in a series of pieces resulting from TSG’s trip to ESPN headquarters for Media Day and the World Cup draw.

If one thing is clear following TSG’s visit to Bristol last Friday, it’s that ESPN is throwing a lot of resources at the World Cup. Whether ESPN is looking at the World Cup in the context of a greater soccer strategy is still up for debate.

ESPN will attempt to bring the World Cup to the world in all its glory.

Media Day started with a quartet of top ESPN executives walking through the “what” and “how” of the forthcoming South Africa ’10 coverage. Jed Drake, who oversees all remote production efforts across all ESPN-related networks, spoke of the importance of the event to ESPN.

This focus has led to Drake’s role being re-focused solely on the tournament as well as ESPN making the World Cup an “organizational priority;” the first time an event has ever received that distinction at the WWL. Oh yeah, there is also that ginormous countdown clock right in the middle of the ESPN campus.

Suffice it to say, the World Cup will be all over ESPN domestic and international networks as well as online and mobile properties. To me, the two most interesting things coming out of ESPN so far are 1) that each game will appear and be archived for 24 hours on ESPN360.com and 2) the current ESPN World Cup iPhone application is loaded with the history of prior tournaments.

From a personnel and exposure perspective, ESPN seems like they are locked-in on wall-to-wall coverage of every game, the game behind the game and the stories around the game with Drake adding that that ESPN is operating at a “far greater level of ambition” than Germany ’06.

Next to the podium was ESPN’s John Skipper who is responsible for the “creation, programming and production of ESPN content across all media platforms.” In other words, he’s kind of a “big deal,” as in #30 on BusinessWeek’s 2008 Top 100 most powerful people in sports. Of note, the Tottenham Hotspur supporter came across as both a straight-forward and likable guy in the morning session and a smaller group interview TSG was a part of later in the day.

Following some World Cup coverage specific questions from fellow media, TSG had the opportunity to query Mr. Skipper and lobbed in the #1 question from TSG readers.

TSG: “What is ESPN’s vision for soccer?”

Skipper: “We don’t have a vision.”

Now that wasn’t the end of Skipper’s answer, but it was a surprising beginning. Mr. Skipper then said that ESPN has a “goal, not a vision” with the goal to present the sport in an “appropriate and authoritative way.” ESPN’s coverage would be credible (to the knowledgeable soccer fan), but “in the American vernacular” that includes presenting the game and the stories (of players, teams and South Africa).

From Skipper’s answer and others throughout the day, it was clear that ESPN regards their involvement in soccer as producer of event coverage for viewers of all varieties with no overall designs or strategy to play a major role in growing the sport in America. This isn’t necessarily surprising when viewed from the Worldwide Leader’s perspective, but none-the-less somewhat disappointing for those who love the sport and realize the immense potential for ESPN to accelerate soccer’s rise in America.

Regardless of any master plan for soccer, ESPN’s commitment to the World Cup should provide a big boost to the world’s #1 game in the US.

Tomorrow, Part II: A World Cup For All Viewers

About these ads

5 responses to this post.

  1. Posted by Dave on 2009/12/09 at 7:15 AM

    “ESPN’s coverage would be …. “in the American vernacular” that includes presenting …. the stories (of players, teams and South Africa).”
    So they want to copy NBC’s coverage of the Olympics and make it palatable to soap opera fans by ignoring the sport itself? Halftime reports full of human interest stories instead of other game highlights? Thank God it will be on the Univisión networks where futbol actually matters and the other stuff is on “Primer impacto” and “Despierta América”.

    Reply

    • Posted by Kevin on 2009/12/09 at 5:52 PM

      I wouldn’t worry. I don’t trust ESPN often with broadcasting soccer, but I think this may be the best of both worlds. It’s not likely that they drop everything to catch viewers if soccer in the US isn’t always getting enough viewers. I don’t think they will leave out highlights all together, but it wont be as in depth as many would like it.

      Reply

  2. I would like ESPN’s coverage a whole heap more if I didn’t have to stare at Alexi Lalas’ glaikit face every time they broadcast a match. I can’t stand that guy. I do like JP Dellacamera and Harksey though. Whatever happened to Seamus Malin?

    I’d say it’s about time for Coach Bob to award Grella his first US cap. But then I’ve thought that ever since he settled in at Leeds. Perhaps Marcus Tracy also deserves a look.

    Keep on keepin’ on Shin Guardian.

    Reply

  3. [...] Yesterday: Part I – Soccer, ESPN & The World Cup [...]

    Reply

  4. [...] vision for soccer. This was covered in our first piece of the “TSG in Bristol” series (Soccer, the World Cup & ESPN), but just know that ESPN is in play for most soccer properties and believes that soccer is [...]

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 220 other followers

%d bloggers like this: