Archive for May, 2010

Turkey vs. USA: The Stands Are Alive

Torres had a great game and was everywhere. Ball control was superb and his tackling was also very good.

The USMNT played much better the second half. They played more cohesive football and taking Spector off was huge. Torres also showed more ball skill then Clark I feel. They key for me though was Findley, who certainly played himself into the starting 11 while showing strength, touch and a fine eye for the game. Altidore got the goal, but Findley was the better player for me. Bornstein played himself out of anything.

Deuce got himself a nice individual goal and the US set themselves up with some chances they should have scored.

A much better performance then against the Czech and kudos to Turkey for coming out and playing hard. Next up for the USMNT an actual WC opponent. Australia!

PEEEP PEEEP PEEP

90:00 – US win a corner as the US have had much better possession and ball control the second half. Their defense was improved but they still gave up way to much off the ball and Bornstein was just awful. He really needs to regroup as he is better then this. As I write this he is turned around yet again as he over commits and another great cross is sent in. Luckily for the US no one from Turkey is there to meet it.

87:00 – Bradley shows his attacking prowess as Holden sends a great ball for Bradley to latch onto. Instead of shooting though he pulls it back for Dempsey who shots narrowly wide. Deuce should have done better but nice build up from the USMNT.

86:00 – Over 55k at the game. Great showing US fans. Fantastic send off.

84:00 – Off a free kick Howard pushes it over the bar. Corner for Turkey but the training ground plan does not go off for the Turks.

Holden on Altidore off.

Continue reading

LD10 On Playing In Front Of A Yankee Crowd

Do you hear us Bristol? 1.0 TV ratings coming shortly!

On what it means to play a Send-Off game in front of a pro-American crowd:

I have no caption.

“I was a little disappointed the other night not to be able to play in a game like that because it’s not too often we have such pro-American crowds.”

“When we play in qualifiers, we always have a large contingent of passionate American fans, but more often than not our opponents’ fans are more prevalent in the stadium. So [the other night] was cool and we expect the same again. There’s no better way to head to South Africa than with a home game like that.”

More from yesterday’s U.S. quote sheet here.

(And maybe this doesn’t belong here….BUT Matt Mathai’s pictures (top, left) are really out-of-this-world. We’ll have a bunch more up to vote on shortly.)

Continue reading

Going Phanatical: Turkey Day In May

This might be the easiest preview to write–or the shortest due to Microsoft.

Will Bob Bradley receive a sign in Philadelphia for who should start up top?

The Yanks heads into the city of Unionified City of Brotherly Love to give about 45,000 spectators the ability to assess for themselves the sum of its parts against Turkey this Saturday. (2pm EST)

Whereas Tuesday saw the developmental squad get a run-out in the 1st half while the 2nd half saluted those that earmarked back to, primarily, MLS, Saturday’s friendly such be a mix of building cohesion and experimentation.

Okay, let’s kickoff our first USMNT preview since March…and let’s get our World Cup road trip started….

As always, we’ll follow the (now-patented) TSG format:

TSG’s “What We’re Looking For”
11 at the Whistle
*Disclaimers

TSG’s “What We’re Looking For”

We need a few more of these big fella (Courtesy: Matt Mathai)

• Okay, let’s try this one again: Whither Gooch?

“You can’t look at observations in isolation; you have to look at the entire body of work.”

Fan observation #2 about to be served.

• What’s the forward combination?

Is Jozy Altidore going to line-up on the left in front of Landon (I don’t think so and not what this writer wants to see) or is he going to line-up on the right, where Edson Buddle started on Tuesday as your target striker?

Given Bob Bradley’s comments on Robbie Findley being effective off the bench. I think you’re gong to see a Gomez – Altidore pairing.

I’m slowly retreating from my “soft goal” stance on Herculez–he looked the part Tuesday against most of the Czech first team–let’s see what he does Saturday. Exciting if he can inhabit that “drag-the-corner-defender” role.

• Let’s hear it for Marcus Hahnemann?

The guy’s 37 — if he’s going to get another cap, this is probably the one.

If you don’t see Hahnemann to start this game, then Brad Guzan is the clear-cut #2.

Edu in thought before Tuesday's game: "Okay, I'm going to score a goal, play shutdown defense, and throw down a stanky leg." (Courtesy, Matt Mathai)

• Is Maurice Edu in the hole?

Michael Bradley is your go-forward central midfielder. He’s got some ability and showed the knack in the Netherlands. Jose Torres did a superb job dropping into the hole and moving the ball on Tuesday.

Will that role go to Maurice Edu? Can he move the ball effectively in that role? Is that how the Yanks play? Ricardo Clark is, by the way, not that guy.

11 At The Whistle

G: Marcus Hahnemann

The skinny: Anybody’s guess here. I think Howard continues to get a break and Hahnemann gets the nod. My guess is if you see Howard in goal, he’s only play the 1st half and Marcus “Aurelius” Hahnemann heads between the pipes.

Tim Howard, again, is from nearby New Jersey.

G: Jonathan Spector, Jay DeMerit, Oguchi Onyewu, Carlos Bocanegra

The skinny: Do the States play arguably #1 backline. There are only two games–wow–left until England. I think they have to here and I think this is it, barring performance impacted by injury.

G: Clint Dempsey, Maurice Edu, Michael Bradley, Landon Donovan

The skinny:  I can see Stu sneaking in here somewhere–and if that’s the case you’re likely seeing Clint Dempsey at forward. I know I’m in the minority, but I just don’t see Dempsey your

Conversely, Stu Holden is a better defender on that right side and that Yanks are better with him on the field (I believe that).

Will be very interesting.

STR: Herculez Gomez, Jozy Altidore

The skinny: We we learned that Edson Buddle is categorically a target man. I think you need that speed guy ahead of Landon as I mentioned above. Let’s see what Gomez does here.

Disclaimers*

Here's what I'm thinking...next time an attackers comes in my area...yada, yada, yada.. (Courtesy, Matt Mathai)

Jonathan Bornstein starts; Boca moves to the middle; DeMerit to bench?

It will be very telling if Bornstein gets a start on Saturday or against Australia…..and yes part of me just wanted to use that picture to the right.

The forward pairing is everything, but Gomez and Altidore.

Jozy and Duece. Big Jeezy and Findley? Buddle and Gomez? If Coach USA is trying to pair Altidore, then I think Gomez here is your best bet.

Ricardo Clark goes for Maurice Edu

Does Clark get a shot here to “compete” for the starting role? It’s hard to argue that in the two friendlies he’s played this year Maurice Edu has been solid and offered contributions. In fact, Edu has looked down right dynamic in the middle.

Wild card? Benny plays the role in the middle of Mike Bradley to start that Torres did on Tuesday and we see a number of folks reference “The Flying Hovestad” goal against Mexico in 2007. (See glossary).

Iceman Holden makes way for someone.

As much as I think Stu will come off the bench against England, I’m finding it very hard to argue that the States aren’t better with Holden on the pitch. Holden is such an asset to Yanks, in that, he plays the complementary role to the tee, but when he’s got that one or two shots to take advantage of an offensive situation in a game, he usually doesn’t miss them.

———-

(Note, for the youngsters, the pic of Bruce Willis up top is a reference to one of my favorite movies: “12 Monkeys.” It was set in Philadelphia…and if you thought you were getting a tired Rocky reference for the city…well.

You may get an “Invincible” reference in the review though.)

USA v. England by ESPN

No problem posting this, but the guys below in the “Don’t Tread Challenge” did theirs on a smaller budget.

Tactical Imagery: USA v. Czech Republic

Good evening TSG readers, its Tuesday here again. Usually I’m going on endlessly about shapes and formations down in the comments section but today I’m bringing you the content. A lot of you are probably thinking “what’s really the difference between 4-4-2 and 4-2-2-2?” I wanted to give everyone a different view of the match from what you normally see on TV, so I bought some tickets up as high as I could behind the goal at Rentschler Field and brought my camera to snap a few photos.

Tim Howard with His Biggest Fan Pre-game

Hall of Fame signature...

Unfortunately we didn’t play our first 11 which generally means we get the basic 4-4-2 shape. I suspect the modifications we see with our first 11 aren’t necessarily coached, it’s just the interesting stuff that happens when the natural tendencies of talented players like Donovan and Dempsey are added to the mix. But here’s my crack at Bob’s tactics on the night anyway, with the focus on the first half when I had a better view and my camera hadn’t yet run out of chips.

US basic 4-4-2 shape when out of possession:

(all images can be enlarged with a click)

1st half defensive aligment

During the first half we were defending the near goal, giving a good view of our defensive shape. Here you can see the clear 4-4-2 shape and good spacing between the US players in this picture to cover the entire field of play. Just to get you a sense of the players we see Bornstein, Onyewu, Goodson, Dolo from left to right in the back four, Beasley, Edu, Torres, Holden in midfield and E. Johnson and Buddle up top.

The CBs are a little slow getting over to the left in expectation of a diagonal long ball inside of Cherundolo. This leaves a gap in the inside channel between Onyewu (LCB) and Bornstein (LB), but there’s no danger of a player running into that space at this moment. Edu has ended up on the left side of the central midfield partnership, pressuring towards the ball – the “strong-side” to borrow a familiar term from the other brand of football.

Torres drops slightly deeper and offers positional support, loosely tracking the player in the hole in front of the CBs to prevent the ball straight into this player’s feet. You wouldn’t want Rooney receiving the ball in this area on June 12, so I’m guessing Bob’s going to try to deny him service unless he drops deep to get the ball. That would be a good tactic. Torres and Edu were particularly good for the first 20 minutes of the match. Edu is a monster.

Outside, Beasley is cutting off the passing lane between the Czech’s RB and RM who is making a run into a wide position along the midfield line. The RB has one of three choices – the  short pass straight up the pitch to the CM who would turn into pressure from Edu and Beasley, to maintain possession by playing the ball across the back 4 or to play a long diagonal ball up to the striker supported by his midfielder just inside Dolo on our right.

Up top you can see Eddie Johnson on the left, trying to get back into the passing lane between the RB and the other CM. Buddle on the right is just drifting back behind the Czech’s central midfielder. These two players could easily put a lot more pressure on the defensive line in possession by taking up better positions. I’d like to see the US defend from the front with one striker over (1-1) the other instead of 2 across (2). This happened at times, but I think more frequently.

If the more advanced striker cuts off the easy pass to the center back (say if EJ stayed 5-10 more advanced) while the deeper play cuts off the pass to the weak-sided CM (Buddle positioned 5 yards to the left). That means the RB has to play is short to a player who can turn into pressure, a long diagonal 50:50 ball up to top or risk a long pass out to the LB that Holden could cheat a bit further up to pitch to potentially cut out, putting the Czech’s under instant pressure. There’s no easy option to maintain possession, with minimal additional effort

We didn’t see any full-pressing against the Czechs with Bob instead preferring to defend with a well-organized shape and ask Beasley and Holden to press as the Czech’s tried to cross half field – half-pressing.

In possession 4-4-2 shape, playing the ball out of the back:

On attack...

The shape is largely the same except for Torres dropping deep to form a triangle with the Onyewu and Bornstein to bring the ball out of the back. He did this very effectively in the first half, setting tempo and organizing the build-up. Further forward, Holden has also tucked inside quite narrowly, leaving Cherundolo as the player in space on the opposite flank. Seeing this picture, it’s not any wonder that a lot of our attacking play funneled from left to the right. In contrast to our defending almost the entire width of the pitch, the Czech’s 4-4-2 shape is more narrow than ours, focusing on on flank, though the ball is in a similar position. The Czech strikers have gotten into better defensive positions, with one preventing the ball to Edu and the other defending space on the halfway line just in front of the central midfield pair. This means the gaps between their defenders are narrower and players time on the ball is more limited as they play up the pitch.

If Holden is going to play so narrowly going forward, I’d like to see him come deeper when the ball is in this position. He did do this once during the first half and it made good things happen. It allowed Edu the confidence to provide Torres with a more penetrative passing option knowing that Holden can cover for him. The Czechs are happy enough to allow us to play the ball around them, but you create danger by playing through a well-organized side. The further up the pitch we can get on the left and centrally with Cherundolo in space on the right, the more dangerous a ball out to him on the right flank becomes.

In person, during the first half, I thought that Beasley was excellent defensively, but he didn’t do quite enough going forward. I think you see why here. Beasley stays relatively high up the pitch when he needs to come deep to form another triangle with Torres and Bornstein in order to play the ball up the left flank. In this position, the ball available to Beasley puts him under immediate pressure from the RB behind him and the CM can quickly close him down and cut off the return pass.

Still, I didn’t think that was entirely Beasley’s own fault. He looked better on television and his drop off in performance was more due to Bornstein’s mini-implosion which began with a ball to no one around 28 minutes. Eddie Johnson simply didn’t offer enough movement out to the left flank. No coincidence that Buddle’s movements over to the left coincided with Beasley’s best play.

If it’s Charlie Davies playing as the left sided striker, you can bet he’s making a run out to the touchline above Beasley, forcing the CB to either track him out wide or the RB that’s currently pressuring Beasley to drop off him and deal with the runner. This would leave Beasley in space and giving the US an outnumbered situation on the left.

On both flanks, Buddle consistently made that run, leaving the US in a 3 v 2 situation out wide. This is important because it presents the opposition with a choice between conceding possession on their flank, or pulls a CM out for additional defensive support, leaving a gap in a more dangerous area for the attack to find a player in space. Good things to happened, including winning the free kick that led to the first goal.

Beasley always plays more like a winger than a wide midfielder – higher up the pitch in possession and close to the touchline – which means helping to keep possesion in this way isn’t the strongest part of his game. He’s always been a bit too static in his running on the wing when in possession, even in his PSV days. In contrast, I would think of Holden as a wide midfielder – even with the ball deep on the left, he’s moving into a central area hoping to receive it. This picture shows why that distinction matters when it comes to how the team plays.

Our players are clearly well-drilled, but the movement in possession up top and in midfield is a bit too static and allowed the Czechs a foothold for about 15 minutes after our good opening 20 minutes. Running needs to be more fluid in order to pull defenders out of shape needs and break down opposition that’s also well-organized so the two systems don’t cancel each other out (more on this below). This meant it was little surprise that our first half goals came on a set piece.

Holden about to take the free kick from which Edu scored:

Holden about to create the 1st goal...

This is in the moments before Holden is about to take the free kick which resulted in Edu’s goal. The Czech’s are marking zonally here and the paid the price with a goal conceded when Holden delivered into an area where they lack cover. The goalkeeper came for it and Goodson beat him to the ball and Edu looked lively to benefit from being at the right place at the right time.

Defending a Czech Free Kick

Berlin!

In contrast, I thought we defended set pieces well and my crystal ball definitely hadn’t predicted a Czech goal to come on one. Unfortunately this pic isn’t as fortuitous as the previous one. This is their free kick in a central area. In contrast to the zonal marking scheme of the Czechs, the US goes straight man to man against the players getting into the box with Holden (22) patrolling the space just inside the wall and Buddle (29) covering the zone just around the D. With all 10 outfield Czech players in frame, there’s no one to the left of the wall so I’m not sure about the position that Beasley has taken up – presumably he’s covering for a touch wide to shoot around the wall.

Unfortunately I don’t have a picture of the goal we conceded on, but as much as anything it was simply poor zonal marking. Onyewu was pulled towards the ball, leaving his far post zone and unable to recover and clear the ball in time. Frankly, it looked like we’d decided it was halftime already and just switched off. Any such lapses in concentration will be punished in South Africa.

In Conclusion: 4-4-2 vs 4-4-2

Ants marching...

This photo is just as Guzan was about to take a goal kick and shows a good example of what happens in 4-4-2 vs 4-4-2. That system often cancels itself out without that little bit of individual brilliance. All the front 6 players are marked leaving only our fullbacks with space to exploit. Also it shows why small modifications can make a big difference in the battle to find and exploit space.

Here are some alternative shapes derived from 4-4-2:

4-2-3-1: Replace Eddie Johnson with an attacking midfield player who plays between Beasley and Holden to make the system 4-2-3-1, suddenly we have 3 v 2 in the center of midfield and while they have a centerback without anyone marking. Does he get pulled into midfield to make up the numbers exposing gaps in the backline? Pushing a good technical midfield player like Torres into his spot and replacing EJ with Bradley could make us more defensively stout while allowing us to play through the center of midfield in a way that is less difficult.

4-4-1-1: Replace Eddie Johnson with Hercules Gomez and ask him to play just behind Buddle to feed off his ball winning and work. The difference between this system and the 4-2-3-1 is the distance between your strikers is minimal. The defensive phase of a 4-2-3-1 tends to look a lot like 4-4-1-1.

4-2-2-2:  I’ve described our Confederations cup system as an “asymetric” 4-2-2-2. Wide players tend to push very high up the pitch, as they are here. The difference between this and that system, Beasley (Davies) would push forward to stay on the offside line in the outside channel (outside the fullback). Eddie Johnson (Dempsey) would be would play deeper and come forward from a wide position on a diagonal line getting more central as he advanced to get into the box and exploiting space Beasley (Davies) opened in the inside channel (between fullback and center-back). With Buddle (Altidore) leading the line as a central striker, Holden (Donovan) would play out on the right flank, much closer to the touchline. The back 6 positions remained the same.

All of these modifications only affect the four most attacking players, while the shape of the back 6 stays roughly the same with only the fullbacks called on to join the attack a bit more or less to provide additional width.

It will rain tears of sorrow in the plains of Spain

Will he lift up the World Cup Trophy July 11th?

The other Guardian publication came out with this article a couple of weeks ago about 6 great teams that never won the world cup. It’s a good read and it got me thinking about other great teams, club and country that had it all but couldn’t capture the big prize. Most recently Barcelona came to mind in this years Champions League. They were an incredible team but couldn’t get it together nor break through Mourinho’s well orchestrated defensive tactics and lost over two legs in the semis.

Spain are a fantastic team. As of now they are the favorite amongst most pundits and bookies to hoist the cup on July 11th. They won Euro 2008 beating holders Greece, Italy and Russia en route to a 1-0 final against Germany. Between the end of 2006 and the summer of 2009, Spain went unbeaten in 35 international matches until they lost to the US in the semis of the Confederations Cup. Since that 2-0 loss in South Africa they have won their last 9 games. That is 1 loss in 45 games!!! This is a great team and a great team that will not win the world cup in 2010.

Continue reading

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 220 other followers